This is G o o g l e's cache of
G o o g l e's cache is the snapshot that we took of the page as we crawled the web.
The page may have changed since that time. Click here for the current page without highlighting.

Google is not affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content.
These search terms have been highlighted:  michael  gelobter  new  york 


Copyright 2000 The New York Times Company
The New York Times
 View Related Topics
February 12, 2000, Saturday, Late Edition - Final
Correction Appended

SECTION: Section A;Page 1;Column 1;National Desk

LENGTH: 1625 words

HEADLINE: Despite Options on Census, Many to Check 'Black' Only


This year's new, racially inclusive census might have seemed tailor made for Michael Gelobter.

The son of a white Jewish father and an African-Bermudan mother, Mr. Gelobter lives in Harlem with his wife, Sharron Williams, a black woman whose Caribbean background melds African and Indian influences. Creating their own cultural road map as they go, the couple embrace the range of their heritages and those of friends, marking Passover, for example, with an African-American Latino seder.

But when the census invites Mr. Gelobter, for the first time, to name all the races that describe him, he will do what he has always done, and claim just one: black. Checkingmore than one race, he contends, would undermine the influence of blacks by reducing their number as a distinct group and so most likely diluting public policies addressing their concerns.

The census forms that will be mailed to most Americans in April -- the count began last month in Alaska, where the winter chill tends to keep people at home and easier to tally -- offers a nod to the nation's increasing diversity. No longer will the Census Bureau instruct respondents to "select one" race to describe themselves. Instead, it will tell them to mark one or more of 14 boxes representing 6 races (and subcategories) that apply -- white, black, American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian Indian, other Asian and Pacific Islander -- or to check "some other race."

But like Mr. Gelobter, many people, indeed most, who could claim more than one race are not expected to do so, demographers and census officials say.

Part of the reason, according to demographers, is habit: Americans are simply unaccustomed to the option. More profoundly, however, the change is fueling a weighty debate about the meaning of race, in which interpretations of history, politics and experience frequently overshadow the simpler matter of parentage.

Thirty years after Loving v. Virginia struck down the last laws barring interracial marriage, the new change in the census and the ensuing controversy have become a barometer of the complexity of American attitudes toward race, and their contradictions. With the 6 racial categories offering 63 possible combinations of racial identity, which government demographers will tabulate as distinct groups, the census could provide a remarkably meticulous racial profile of American society.

On one side of the debate stand those who see the revision as a tactic to divide blacks at a time when affirmative action and other remedies to discrimination are under attack. Opposing them are multiracial Americans who resent having to identify with just one part of their heritage.

Apart from his perception that the change could diminish blacks' influence, Mr. Gelobter, a 38-year-old professor of environmental policy at Rutgers University, said that claiming a multiracial identity would link him to a bitter, freighted history of privilege for blacks who could cite some white lineage.

"Should Frederick Douglass have checked white and black?" Mr. Gelobter said. "Should W. E. B. Du Bois have checked white and black? He practically looked white."

The decisions people make, while personal, will echo through public policy. The Justice Department uses racial data from the census to analyze voting patterns and evaluate redistricting proposals under the Voting Rights Act. The department's special investigations division uses such data to look into accusations of racial profiling by law-enforcement officers. And city and state planners study the information to direct help to needy communities and predict population trends.

"It's hard to come up with an area of our work where we wouldn't have, at one point or another, a need to have census information broken down by race," said Anita S. Hodgekiss, deputy assistant attorney general for civil rights.

But the Justice Department has not determined how it will classify people who check more than one race, Ms. Hodgekiss said.

The racial data the census provides is so crucial to developing civil rights policy and directing government aid that some groups like the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People are urging people of both black and white parentage to identify themselves as only black. The Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund has made a similar request of people who are part white and part Asian.

The impact of the change remains hazy, however, since it is not known how many people will claim more than one race. In census dress rehearsals in a variety of locations around the country in 1998, only 2 percent of those surveyed checked more than one race, said Jorge del Pinal, a spokesman for the Census Bureau.

Demographers are bracing for an avalanche of data, while others predict a raft of court cases challenging redistricting.

"God help us," said Joseph J. Salvo, director of the New York City Planning Department's population division, who sits on a national committee advising the Census Bureau about the coming count. "This is being worked out as we go."

Kerry Ann Rockquemore, a sociologist at Pepperdine University, polled 250 college students who had one black parent and one white, and found that those reared in middle-class or affluent white neighborhoods tended to identify as biracial, while those who had grown up in black communities generally considered themselves black.

How will nonblacks of mixed race answer the census? There is little more than anecdotal evidence. But some experts note that checking options like Asian and white, or American Indian and Pacific Islander, does not carry the same historical baggage that mixed-race blacks confront in deciding whether to say they are part white.

Scott Wasmuth, who is white and has a Filipino wife, said that when he filled out the census in 1990, he ignored the one-race-only rule that then prevailed and checked both white and Asian to describe his daughters. This year he will do the same. "People are beginning to say, 'I'm a mixture, and I don't have to choose one or the other,' " he said.

Bertrand Wade, a 34-year-old industrial electronics technician from Brooklyn, wishes he could avoid descriptions altogether. His father is half-black and half-white, and his mother is East Indian and white.

When applications ask his race and none of the boxes fit, Mr. Wade said, "the first thing I feel is excluded; then sometimes I feel that I should not be in a position where I have to state my race." He said that on the census, he would check all the boxes that describe his heritage.

Charles Byrd, who runs a Web site called Inter Racial Voice, said, "What we need to do as a country is get rid of these stupid boxes altogether."

On the 1990 census, about 10 million Americans seemed to agree. They did not identify themselves as members of any race, said Margo J. Anderson, author of "The American Census: A Social History" (Yale University Press, 1988). Another quarter-million, ignoring the instructions, identified themselves as belonging to more than one race.

Ms. Anderson said that ever since the first head count, in 1790, the census had played an important if subtle role in reflecting preoccupations and shaping social thought. It is only in the last century, though, that the government has devised questions to identify the country's ethnic makeup. In the 1910 census, for instance, the government asked people their mother tongue, looking for Yiddish as the answer in order to tally the number of Jewish immigrants.

"The changes in questions always come about because of the social issues of the day," Ms. Anderson said.

Susan Graham, head of Project Race, a civic group that unsuccessfully pushed for a separate "multiracial" box for the census, said she wanted a single category that would accurately define her children.

"Think of when you open a newspaper and see pie charts," she said. "We wanted a slice of the pie that says 'multiracial.' "

Ms. Graham, of Tallahassee, Fla., is white and married to a black man. When she testified before Congress, she brought along 14 pages detailing crimes against interracial families. Without a single statistical category for interracial people, she argued, those crimes remain obscured in the thicket of hate crimes generally.

Some opponents of the change describe it as a passport to denial, and a reflection of prejudice. "The only reason it isn't fair to make them choose one race is because of what it means to be black in America," said Wendy Thorpe-Cruz, who is black and teaches multiculturalism in a high school equivalency program in Harlem.

Ms. Thorpe-Cruz, 43, said she had felt the sting of racism every day -- from white women who clutch their purses when she passes, from white men she once dated who dared not introduce her to their parents. "In order to understand why people are asking for the biracial category, every white person would have to be black for a year," she said.

Ben Karp, the founder and director of the Chai Society, an "intellectual salon" for blacks and Jews at Yale, acknowledged a gap between his ideal, "a world in which there are no boxes," and his decision to identify himself as exclusively black on the census. Mr. Karp, whose father is white and Jewish and whose mother is black, said, "It's a contradiction we're forced to live with."

Mr. Karp noted that in America, the label "black" on people who are only partly so tends to incorporate other races in their lineage, including white and Native American, while "white" means the absence of other races. Socially, he said, "black Americans get identified with their poorest members -- success is seen as the exception."

He looked up, leaned forward and said, "I am also the black experience."

CORRECTION-DATE: February 16, 2000, Wednesday

An article on Saturday about a change that lets census respondents assign themselves to more than one race misstated the name of a Web site run by Charles Byrd, who expressed hope that a time would come when race did not matter. It is Interracial Voice, not Inter Racial Voice.

GRAPHIC: Photos: Michael Gelobter and his daughter, Troy, in their Harlem home. On the census, he will check one race: black. (Marilynn K. Yee/The New York Times); Kerry Ann Rockquemore, a sociologist, found that the race with which mixed-race collegians identified varied with their childhood community. (Misha Erwitt for The New York Times)(pg. A10)


LOAD-DATE: February 12, 2000



Found at: